Well, at a court of law, this shifting of the burden of proof might mean the difference between a guilty- or innocent- verdict. But here? Maybe it could mean in practice, that we should not frantically search for every last bit of scrap we can offer as proof of their guilt, and they ridiculing us, citing authorities and parents' believes and long ages gone, but instead we taunt and ridicule them about the monstrosity of their lie, whereupon they have to come forward and produce their proofs, which look silly. Well something along those lines; just a thought anyway.
APOLLO FEEDBACK
Read what the media say about naughty NASA
________________________________________________________________
nasrinfarouzi@null.net  Subject: NASA footage..

My name is Nasrin, and I was reading your excellent articles, debunking NASA's Apollo program; I was curious if you happened to have any ''damning'' video footage, lol, that you would be willing to email me, just for private use, or strictly educational, perhaps to be posted on my personal channel. Just asking, and thank you for your time.
________________________________________________________________
chad.e.brown.nyc@gmail.com  Subject: I just discovered you website about the faking of the Apollo landings.

For several years I have been studying so-called conspiracy theories.  Most of them turn out to be true, and supported by alternative media.  In order to qualify as “conspiracy theories”, they also need to be denied by Wikipedia.  JFK was not killed by Oswald, 9/11 was done by the US government, and so on for dozens of other examples.

The Apollo moon landings is in the same category, I have thought, but I have not committed as much time to prove it.  I am 69, have an undergraduate degree from Harvard and an MBA from Stanford.

Can you tell me your name, and are there other sources I could go to confirm your experience?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
Wile.E.Coyote@birdlover.com Subject: I can only answer the metric system question.

Hi, NASA is a subsidiary and/or partner of USAF. That is where most astro-Nots come from. Today, the military uses the metric system because it is easier in the heat of battle for calculations to be done. Not sure what year we changed to it but we did.
However, we need to save the original NASA photos because they watched the Fox "Lunar Landing Hoax" Show and have been deleting their own photos & videos since. Modification of evidence is also prevalent, we need to archive more originals people, lets make the internet work FOR us. Thanks.
ashleyjenniferclark@outlook.com Subject: Love your website

Hi, can I ask where this info came from or where I can find it?

"the day after the fake Apollo 11 Moon landing, NASA administrator, Thomas Paine, was heard telling Intelligence officer Bob Seaman's that the Chinese were saying the USA faked the mission by bouncing radio communication signals off the Moon" Just wanted to know.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
mpalmer@uwaterloo.ca Subject: Interesting data about radiation exposure aboard Apollo missions.

Hi, I like your "apolloreality" site - hilarious.

Here are some papers I found which support the idea that indeed the Apollo missions never left Earth orbit. The Benton paper lists the radiation dosages received by the astronauts aboard various space missions (see tables on page 270ff). Those aboard the Apollo missions are a on the slightly higher side, but even the highest dosage (Apollo 14) is said to be lower than that experienced aboard the shuttle flight that serviced the Hubble telescope, which (I just looked it up) orbits at 559 km above Earth. I guess they just sent Apollo 14 up a little higher, or maybe there was a solar flare of some kind.

The paper by Shin calculates the radiation dosages aboard a hypothetical lunar spacecraft that would spiral around Earth many times before actually leaving it. While the cumulative exposure would of course be much higher, we can still use the estimated dosage per day for comparison (see Figure 5). That dosage is about 500 rad per day, or about a million times higher than aboard Apollo. Even if we assume that the astronauts had crossed this zone of intense radiation in one tenth of a day, and that that this short term dosage was averaged out over the duration of the entire flight, this would still give a much higher value than reported. So overall, these papers seem to clearly support your case. Best wishes, Michael
________________________________________________________________
Laurelanne31@hotmail.com Subject: Link tampering

Hi, love your website on Apollo fakery! Sharing it on fb. I'd seen other sites about the fakery but your site is by far the best! Photos no one else has and lots of info too!

Noticed that one of your links is busted, and then redirected to some other site. If you go to Apollo Data page and click Apollo Reality on that page, you get a "can't be reached" message, and a go to  " http://atspace.com/" which takes you to a webhosting site. Oh, a little FYI for you. Look into how many astroNOTS are Freemasons. AND.. the grave stone of Wernher Von Braun has Psalms 19:1 on it."The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork." (KJV)"
________________________________________________________________
harold.harrison@protonmail.com Subject Trump takes us to the Moon.

Thank you for a great site - I appreciate the humour, which is kind of needed in thinking that the dreams of your childhood in being an astronaut are just a cruel lie, much like Santa, or the Easter Bunny.

I think all I needed to know about current US politics was the current promise of manned trips to Mars. That would be one feat, especially as SpaceX can't seem to land a rocket without it being faked footage of it being backwards. And Elon is miles ahead of anyone else (included Richard Virgin Branson) - just ask him!
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
malayeda@yahoo.com Subject:  Jupiter's probe JUNO

I've seen this video where NASA engineer admitted they can't get past the Van Allen Belts (see link below). It made me wonder how were the space probes sent beyond the belt in the past? If you won't mind, I would like to know about your opinion on Jupiter probe, Juno. It is now sending images of Jupiter like never before (eg Jupiter's pole etc)
disney.signals@live.com Subject: NASA make themselves look ridiculous, and stupid

RE: APOLLO FRY UP. In the meantime, if NASA claim to have sent astronauts to the Moon in the 1960's, then over 48 years later they produce a video explaining that astronauts cannot leave Earth orbit due to deadly space radiation, do they not realize just how ridiculous and stupid they make themselves look to the rest of the world? NASA is composed of government workers after all .... and produce government results .... Your links and analysis are excellent! Thanks for your endeavors. Glenn Disney
aldosterone111@gmail.com Subject: Moon and NASA

Hello. Amazing website! Great job really! I read your analysis until 3 AM this morning, and I will be reading more today.

How people can believe that the NASA went to the moon in the sixties is just beyond me. I used to challenge this belief in society but I am more careful about it now. People are so brainwashed to believe whatever they hear, and see on the TV, and what their government tell them. Many "believers" don't have the technical knowledge to really understand what does it mean to go to another planet and back.

Did you hear about a report someone was preparing in the late sixties? Apparently it was something ordered by the US Parliament or similar authority about NASA. The guy, (Thomas Baron), who was working on it died, and the report disappeared just after that. Does it ring a bell by any chance? Thanks Aldo
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
tahir.ranauk@gmail.com Subject: NASA

Great work I recently woke up after believing NASA for more than 35 years of my life. I used to watch Patrick Moore as a child for crying out loud but what the hell. I like many few sheep realised that 1969 moon landing was faked but really believed that America did land after that, oh was I an idiot. For some strange reason the School Brainwashing never got me to believe in evolution, maybe that was a good thing!!

The deception of NASA and the awaking of the sheep via YouTube will one day put an end to this great deception!! Thanks once again.
________________________________________________________________
janpenguin@riseup.net SUBJECT: Rocket can't make interplanetary space travel ever!

Hi there, It's rare to find genuine humans nowadays, I salute for your courage to tell the truth.

Rocket propulsion is garbage technology. The Apollo spacecraft used one Saturn V rocket, 110 m of height, 2,900 tons of weight. It's a size of 30 story building. Suppose the Apollo spacecraft went to the moon what NASA claimed, in return trip back to Earth another Saturn V was required. Did they have two Saturn Vs?

Earth is moving at 30 km/s in space. Even the Apollo spacecraft got close to Earth and the gravity started pulling it, without powerful rocket the re-entry capsule would explode due to excessive deceleration speed in atmosphere. By the time it reaches to 20 km of altitude, the reentry capsule is falling at speed of Mach 22 to 30.

I see why there hasn't been a physicist who debunk's Apollo mission using basic laws of physics that any person who has reasoning power canverify it. Scammers are increasing the voice of Space Exploration recently. SpaceX, Mars mission in near future with Rockets, which are absurd. Gullible general public is the problem I can think of.

Anyway I'm planning to write a small essay that explains why the Apollo mission was impossible, so NASA faked it in 1969 onward, why manned space mission is absurd idea in 21st century. I'll use the laws of physics to do it.  Regards Hughe

Author: They faked it before 1969. Apollo 8 in Dec 1968 was the first fake Moon mission.
________________________________________________________________
reeleder@yahoo.com Subject: Yes

Excellent site.  It seems quite obvious now, but I must admit it was a difficult awakening process. Curious,  my dad, employed
in civil aviation at the time of supposed first moon landing said it was "bullshit" as did his friends, some of whom where in the local airforce base. I said he didn't understand the advances in technology like I did (ha, ha).

My question to you: do you believe the internet is scrubbing references to the NASA Rocket Scientist Actor, Dr.Adam Stelzner?  The 2012 NASA Press Conference starring Stelzner as lead Mars Rover Mission director was mind-bendingly disgusting,  how anyone with an IQ above 80 could believe anything he said as "believable" is beyond me.  But frankly, what I saw in that "BS" press conference is not obvious to friends that I know.  I remain stupidified they cannot see this disgusting nonsense as it is. 

Therefore,  I can only come to the view, that the Adam Stelzner character, is but a psy-ops, I mean the elites are obviously mocking the native intelligence of all Americans. I know this is but one example of Actors being used in the NASA Hoax but I am curious as to your views.  Keep up good work, Dave
________________________________________________________________
allen.henderson.art@gmail.com Subject: Hi, love the website

I enjoy your site tremendously, it is good you are showing the world what a lie the whole NASA industry is. It's also quite funny that you call believers PANs, as Pan is associated with Saturn, Pan is a representation of Saturn, aka. The devil, Satan. They are believing the Satanic lies. Regards, Allen Henderson
________________________________________________________________
geneulm95993@gmail.com Subject: Hello

I don't know how long this NASA site has been up, or even if this is a good email. 

I see flaws in both arguments, I am not a fan of the Moon landing, however, I think we have been there and are there now.  The billions of dollars in budgets that we see are pay offs to contractors to make a public show, while they work, behind scenes on the real stuff. Have a nice day.  Keep up the good work. I am not totally convinced of your position, however, I don't think you are bonkers either.  Thanks Gene Ulm

Author: My website has been up, and hosted under a subdomain, at various providers since 1996
________________________________________________________________
rmorice140@gmail.com Subject: The NASA Fake

i am a french, and i think your story it's reality because i think usa country is a conspiracy and i would like too say that in france because all the pepole would like too now.

Author: Would those who are not English speaking please use Google translator before posting any comment.
________________________________________________________________
kchrisc@connectedcomputer.com Subject: Apollo Photo IDs

Hello, I like your site on the Apollo Scam

I would like to request the photo IDs of the photos cited. Not the links, but just the IDs. That way I can rapidly find and confirm your findings, not that I doubt them. I would then also be able to download, and archive, those photos for the inevitable day that NASA takes them down. I am not lazy, but there are hundreds of photos from the fake mission of Apollo 17 alone, and even the low-res file sizes can be rather large.

My poor dad has been totally upended on the revelation of Apollo being fake. The final straw was when he realized that, as a semi-pro. photographer. in the 70s, the depth of field in the photos was all incorrect, etc. Sorry dad.

Thank you, and keep up the good work. Any help that you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, K. Chris Caldwell
________________________________________________________________
malayeda@yahoo.com Subject: Great materials

Hi, Just writing to thank you for your great work on many "Apollo reality" series. I must admit, as a child in 1970s, after made to believe on human's greatest achievement (Moon Landing) and now finding out the real truth about it during the age of the internet, I cannot describe my deepest sadness of discovering the greatest lie to humanity.

I was surprised that your website reached its 20th anniversary in 2016, and I have therefore been in the dark for most of that time. To be honest, I am now unable to believe anything that NASA has claimed to have achieved especially in regards to Mars and Pluto missions. If it is not troublesome for you, would it be possible for you to briefly guide me, from your point of view, about their Mars/Pluto discoveries. Is it justified that I feel they are fake too?

To be honest, I used to spend most of my young years (20s) reading on subject of Astronomy which has always been my passion. Now I don't even know what I do know and what I don't (I  mean fake or real). It is so sad and confusing. I just saw on the news today:  NASA announces blue skies and frozen water detected on Pluto

So much that it incites my innerself, I couldn't make myself give much attention to it as that may be just another elaborate lie... As someone with an expertise in this area, what do you think? Thank you once again for your great writings on this subject.  Best regards,  Riz
________________________________________________________________
eigil.skovgaard@gmail.com Subject: Who is?

Hello, Have I missed Your About page? I appreciate your information very much, but I would like to know who You are, as it strengthen Your credibility - and mine, when I refer to You.

Who doesn't remember "the first man on the Moon". For a long time I had no doubts at all. I assembled all the plastic models from Revell, Airfix etc. Actually it was my oldest son who presented me for "a Moon hoax", in 2004. The main argument at that time was the Van Allen belts, and I think the radiation, regardless the source, is still a major factor when planning manned missions in outer space. But I don't know for sure. How strong is the radiation really out there and what is the nature of it? I find it difficult to obtain consistent and neutral information from the Internet regarding this question. Since then he and I have discussed the details a lot, and now as a pensioner I have the time to investigate Project Apollo from the Internet.

I found your site referred to in an interview with Bill Kaysing. Your findings are impressing and useful. I have no private website regarding this subject, only about photographic images and it is still under construction (ask4photos.com). Best regards, Eigil Skovgaard
________________________________________________________________
editor@uncensored.co.nz Subject: Permission to reprint

Greetings from New Zealand: I edit Uncensored magazine, a small NZ-based quarterly. www.uncensored.co.nz I was very much impressed with your Apollo Reality work and would like to bring it to the attention of our readers. May I please have your permission to reprint it in the next issue of the magazine? If that's OK, please let me know any bio information you would like me to include, if any. Your website will feature prominently. Many thanks, and all the best, Jonathan Eisen
________________________________________________________________
simonbuddsimon@xxx.co.uk Subject: Moon landings

this subject i find interesting because it razes a lot of issues about the moon landings.
________________________________________________________________
Hannan0000 has sent you a message

Hi, I just wanted to send you a quick message to say THANK YOU for uploading these videos! I have been made to feel like I'm crazy for suggesting that the Apollo missions were fake, but your videos and website have confirmed it for me. You are a true hero.

This message was sent to my Youtube channel, and not e-mail.
________________________________________________________________
leonardojcaldas@hotmail.com Subject Declassification in 2026

Hello, Great site, with a lot of good info about this hoax that is the biggest shame of the science ever.
i want to know were did you find the info about declassification of the documents in 2026? Best regards. Leonardo Caldas
________________________________________________________________
mydocpro@gmail.com Subject: Utmost thanks

In spite of 'quite a few' annoying typos in your excellent work, I find this to be the greatest achievement for de-brainwashing myself of the NASA's lunacy. The PANs are an outspoken bunch and this info needs to sink in their ears. Again, utmost thanks and blessings for your most excellent help.
________________________________________________________________
piras57@gmail.com Subject: Your site.

Congratulations for your site. I am an avid Moon Hoax reader and found your to be one of the most informative sites around. This said, I’d like to point you to a minor bug. There are several orthography inaccuracies here and there, which could give PAN’s food for retaliation. For instance, combing my memory, “meniares syndrome" instead of Ménière’s syndrome, or Hubbell instead of Hubble. Would you please fix them? It would make your argument stronger. Warm regards, Marcello Piras Puebla, Mexico
________________________________________________________________
dowdenislike@gmail.com Subject: Apollo Reality

Hi I have just come across your site and I am truly fascinated and amazed by what I have just seen and read. I have been researching the moon landing fakes for quite some time, but this is the first time that I have come across something that actually shows "how it was done". I would like to thank you for an amazing informative site and I wish that I could help you in some way to finally reveal and expose the REAL truth to the World and in particular the PAN’s (Brilliant!! J). Amazing Job, well done!! Many Thanks Jon
________________________________________________________________
expattaffy@gmail.com Subject: Faked Moon Landings

Hi, Been reading your excellent article APOLLO REALITY. Could you please give me your opinion on a video of mine.
All the evidence you need to prove Apollo was a hoax, watch?v=qsHCPYS9Mhk Would appreciate your opinion. Thanks
________________________________________________________________
danngenie@gmail.com Subject Grammar

Lots of nice information, but the persistent erroneous use of the apostrophe is most distracting.
________________________________________________________________
douglas.ha@gmail.com Subject: Good site, but now what?

HI, Good site, but so what. If they are a scam and lying why are they doing it, do they know more than anyone? Any links on this?

Author: My APOLLO TRUTH page reveals the reasoning behind it.
________________________________________________________________
profrogues@yahoo.com Subject: Your site nails it good and proper

Yep, this site nails it. It has several pages. I don't see how anybody who reads this site could still be a believer in NASA's scam. Aulis used several of these photos on their own website, perhaps their book also. Good thing I kept this site in my bookmarks, because now with all the paid NASA debunking sites cluttering up the search engines you can't find anything anymore.
________________________________________________________________
fshn1055@yahoo.com Subject: Government lies

American government hasnt gone anywhere that it did not return to over and over , destroying it for its own greed....there's no way america went to the moon for only a few trips to basically do nothing ......they would have resourced the hell out of it , and put an army covering it , not allowing another sole around it ,,,just as they have with everything else they intruded upon.
________________________________________________________________
uglymod@aol.com Subject Apollo Reality

What happened to this website. I had to view it on archive and the photos didnt pop up. This site was full of resources no other site has. With Neil Armstrongs death it's even harder coming across moon landing hoax info. I hope you get another site up.

Author: Site was moved from Bravehost to Atspace in July 2012
korgho5757 has replied to your comment on Viking First Views of Mars:

NASA needs to reevaluate its goals with respect to public meaning funding. Some day admitting the hoaxes will be a better investment than sticking to their current propaganda.
________________________________________________________________
sanchezal28@gmail.com Subject: Kubrick

In 2001:  A Space Odyssey, the zero-gravity scenes are perfectly done.  It looks like they are in zero-gravity.  But, in scenes on the lunar surface, people are walking around jerkily, like they are in a Charlie Chaplin movie.  It sticks out like a sore thumb.  Obviously, NASA told Kubrick that he couldn't make the moon scenes look realistic because it would look just like the Apollo fake video. Also, regarding the Curiosity landing on Mars, NASA says they landed in area 51.

http://www.openminds.tv/curiosity-lands-in-area-51-821/   Someone else mentions this on your feedback page. They are really busting our balls!!!

Author: NASA never bust my balls, moreover I bust theirs.
________________________________________________________________
mp4city@gmail.com Subject: Need help to convince PAN's

Yesterday i was working with my brother in law and asked him if he believed we landed on the moon and his response was "of course we did" When i said to him are you aware that if you researched it you would discover that it was faked?. His reply was, "there is not enough evidence to dispute the fact we never went ,so its pointless thinking we didnt".(so obviously he had looked into it at some stage). When i pressed the subject he quickly changed the conversation.
Unbelievable....... how can something so obviously fake, fool so many people ?? I used to think this guy was a reasonably intelligent person, but now when i look at him i just see an idiot. It blows me away how many pans defend this lie but to come to the realization i have family and people i know that also believe in Apollo is CRAZY. I mean we are kiwis, there is no patriotic tie to the USA so WHY defend the moon landings?..its MINDBLOWING stuff.

My father wasnt sure for awhile but finally hes convinced it never happened (the link to your site helped open his eyes big time)
And yes i have watched the video you posted on radiation and it makes Alan bean look like even more of a moron now than he did before when he states that he wasnt sure if they went "far enough out" We know that if the astronauts were really aware of how deadly the van allen belts were and if they were actually going through them, they would have been put through multiple tests & training over a lengthy period of time and would be FULLY aware of what the van allen belts were & the threat they posed to them.
As for PANS.....the thickest most gullible, IGNORANT people on the planet, i post the odd response on you tube now but have come to the same realization you have that im banging my head on a brick wall debating with these morons.

But sometimes i just have to have my say lol. Posting videos as you have done & the great website you have put together is the best way to expose this lie. all the best, Cameron

Author: I think it's the PAN's that need help, commonly known as pyschiatric help. I gave up debating them over 20 years ago.
________________________________________________________________
klausdl@gmail.com Subject: the reality is very sad

Hi!' I've found your page and would like to thank you for exposing the biggest lie of the world with very good and detailed informations. When I was younger I asked myself if the moon landing would really be the truth simply because I've found the terrain from the Nasa's footage very different than the way we saw through our telescopes at home. Not to mention the extreme brightness that would make impossible to take pictures with an archaic Hasselblad in 1969! Also the most important: the radiation that would have fried all of them.

I suggested some PANs on youtube to read the facts on your site and they just ridicularized it saying it´s below amateur. What can you expect from such people? But I think your site deserve a better look and would like to help to make these changes happen. I'm also thinking to make a portuguese version (I'm from Brazil) and add much more facts. Best regards Klaus
________________________________________________________________
r_lynton@yahoo.com Subject: Great site

Thanks for your site. I was amazed to see the sophisticated 'simulators' they had at Langley. One photo looked just like a film set! Very eerie! I have since spotted a really fake looking bit of moon footage which looks just like a bit of foam spray on a perfect sphere! The still might be a good addition to your site. 12:12 at YouTube.com/watch?v=4M-RQFgDizc Perhaps I could send you a still...?

I am surprised by 2 of my friends who seem to be PANs! They also believe firmly in CO2 causing dangerous global warming! I think they are both atheists and statists! Perhaps they lack imagination...? I have seen a few spelling errors on your site. Would you like me to point these out? Eg 'to' versus 'too'... Any idea where the moon rocks are from? It makes sense that Apollo was 3 men in Low earth orbit. This fits nicely between Gemini and the Space Shuttle. It looks like the lies started at Apollo 8...?
________________________________________________________________
andi.burger2013@gmail.com Subject: Burden of proof

Hi there! Thank you for the wonderful work with your nasascam-series! I'm convinced since a long time, that the manned moon-flights were not real, and you just added to that conviction. My personal connection to the apolloscam is as follows: When I was three and a half years old, I enjoyed one of the best sleeps I had - ever-, when my parents brutally (not literally so, but subjectively felt) awoke me from my slumber. I would not have wanted to wake up for anything in the world. Then they told me, that people were in the process of landing on the moon - or any such gibberish -, and I would have the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to witness this greatest achievement of mankind live on TV. Well, I was not very grateful for that chance, and I told them so, but anyway - the sleep of my life had gone. So from my youngest days onward I had a strong antipathy against all this moon-stuff, the images looked fake to me, the whole concept was ridiculous, and so I did not really believe it, without having any proof whatsoever.
Since a few years I am now following this topic on the internet, where the truth comes out quite clearly, that there were no manned moon-landings.Just now, after reading your famous pieces about the apolloscum - correction apolloscam -, I am having a thought which might be helpful in this area - or maybe not.
From time immemorial people knew it to be utter nonsense to reach moon and stars, for our place is on the earth. So when this whole moon-travel business came up, it sounded rather foolish and preposterous. But our parents saw it on TV in the end, and so they believed it. After all, pictures cannot lie, nore can governments. Or can they? Now the thing to consider is: From the start, the burden of proof lay with the perpetrators/actors of the scam. As it happened, our parents accepted grainy BW TV-footage as proof for the impossible; but does this mean, that we - their heirs - have also inherited this acceptance, or have we to be convinced anew by the elite, that the alleged moon-walks did take place?
When you take Einstein's theories of relativity, the scientists of his day purportedly accepted it after srutiny, does this mean, that all following generations of scientists must accept his theories unconditionally without verifying the theories for themselves, or is the burden of proof still on the theory and its defenders? Of course it is! (BTW there are some serious flaws in the theories - Herbert Dingle was correct) Likewise we today who never gave our approval to or acceptance of the moon-scam, are still to be convinced by the powers-that-be, that the Apollo-program was for real. If it had been real, there would have been plenty of possibilities to gather unrefutable proof, for example getting a camera to the moon, that could photograph the stars, or the earth - shots that cannot be faked. As it is, ALL the so-called evidence is of the type, that can be faked - and was!
But as stated above, that is not our problem, we do not believe in the manned moon-landings, as little as in Santa-Claus, and if whoever wants to convince us from the opposite, he should deliver the goods. Meaning: it is enough for anyone to merely state: I believe the moon-landings were lies, and leave the burden of proof to the other side. We are merely defending a rational standpoint, THEY want to convince us about Apollo, so THEY have to prove it. What is happening just now is: We have to find the proof, that Apollo was not real, and until that is proven scientifically, the fact of those landings remains truth. Ok, that sounds nice on paper, but what could that mean in practice? I don't know. I just thought it might be worthwhile to share.
FEEDBACK 2
RETURN TO NASASCAM PAGE
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________